Dan Chiasson’s Natural
History is a collection of poems written in satirical sense. Most use
animals, the most prominent one being an elephant as seen by the three poems
titled, “The Elephant,” and with the last section being written from the point
of a circus elephant (Ryan). His title refers to
Pliny’s “Historia Naturalis.” The title was taken because Chiasson used Pliny’s
work as inspiration, but only as a model. He “does not re-appropriate the text
in a recognizable manner…What Chiasson was looking to mimic was a different kind
of information” (Cronk). In the back of the
book in Chiasson’s notes, he says that in a few cases, he “borrowed images and
phrases from Pliny” in cases such as the poem, “The Elephant (I).” However, the
poems “derive their elements in their stance, their voice, and the cadence from
Pliny” (Chiasson).
Building on that, I really admire the form of the poetry
in the second and third sections of the book. The form, to me, went really well
with the flow of the poems and I found reading them enjoyable. I also really
enjoyed the topics and the satire in the poems. My favourite would be “There is
a Star in the Sea.” To me, this poem was really well written, especially given
that it is one of the shortest in the books. It really did give me a laugh as compared
to the other poems.
In this poem, Chiasson personifies the star, in that “it
had the good sense to become a fish, but the wit/ to keep its shape.” I found
this line is really applicable to the title Natural History, in that from a
biological standpoint, this was how evolution somewhat works. The animals,
through their genome have this “wit” to evolve over countless generations so
that they can adapt to a new environment.
What I really found comical about this poem was the line,
“But one day I’ll play a trick on it – I’ll turn the ocean / Upside down!” Here
Chiasson speaks as if he could switch the sky and the ocean so that the star
will once again be a star, just so he could “pray to it.”
I found this to be the most comical,
but the poem I found the most interesting was the long poem in the third
section, “Scared by the Smallest Shriek of a Pig, and When Wounded, Always give
Ground.” The poem was about a circus elephant but what I find most interesting
about this poem was the voice from the perspective of the circus elephant, and
the content of the poem itself.
say, “charred” instead of “burned” --
as in “charred in a fire”? Real life is so raw,
all on its own; it hurts; words should perhaps
protect us from real life.
Perhaps words should be a shield, rather than
a mirror; and maybe poems should be
an ornamented shield, like the shields
gods made for their favorite soldiers,
sons and lovers. Poems should be
like people’s faces by firelight:
a little true, for verification’s sake,
but primarily beautiful. Or like
pomegranates: hard to open at first
but, when you get them open, full of sweet granules
of meaning. Once, when I was bathed in wine
as part of a military victory parade,
I was purple for a month --
I liked the looks of me that way,
like a giant pomegranate seed!
That’s what a poem should be:
recognizable reality, but dyed,
a sign that someone here felt joy,
someone was released from pain...
In these verses, Chiasson is
peaking about poetry and what poems should be. I really found that these lines
stayed with me the most after reading the poem. It was as if, a student taking
a course in Creative Writing, I finally got this poetic description of what a
poem should be.
Works Cited
Chiasson,
D. (2006). Natural History and Other Poems. Bloodaxe Books Ltd.
Cronk, O. (n.d.). Natural
History by Dan Chiasson. Retrieved from
http://www.bookslut.com/poetry/2005_09_006546.php.
Ryan, K. (n.d.). Absolut
Pliny. Retrieved from New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/20/books/review/20ryan.html