Nox,
by Anne Carson, is an artistic display combining different visual and literary
art to create a new kind of poetic experience for her readers. The format of
the book in and of itself is a large factor that contributes to the unique
experience of reading her book. It is not a book bound to a straight spine, it
is a box, which one has to open and go inside of in order to get to the actual
book, which is one large, accordion shaped stream of paper with different
pictures and words written in different ways on each fold. There are pictures
of torn pieces of letters from her deceased brother, whom she was estranged
from, and, on some pages, there are words highlighted from the letters and used
in her own accounts of his life.
One of the things about this book
that I found to be so impressive, was that the story of the relationship
between the brother, who had run away and never come back, and the author and
her mother, and between the authors brother and his deceased love, then between
the author and her brother’s widow, was conveyed to the reader through actual
pictures and clippings from letters and reiterations of specific thoughts and
feelings that had larger impact than others. The placement of these letters,
thoughts, words, pictures, and drawings, allowed the reader to be surprised and
filled with a small kind of suspense with the turning of each page. There was
something new and meaningful, conveyed in different manners, on every page.
This book did not simply hand the story, poetry, and art to the reader, it
placed emotional triggers in places the reader had to pay attention to and look
for.
Carson
turned her pain and confusion into a kind of scrapbook, which she shared with
the world by having it published. While reading it, it feels as though you are
peaking into someone’s deepest thoughts and desires. To me, it almost felt as
if I was reading her diary. Nox was
so personalized in everyway, it felt as though I was being intrusive in reading
through it. There were staple marks where there had been no staples, family
photos (with or without descriptions of their significance), drawings, and
excerpts of text following the chronological story of Carson’s experience, or
lack there of, with her brother.
This is a
story about loss, but not the way that we usually think of loss. Usually we
think of the loss of a sibling in a similar way as losing a best friend, but
that is not always the case. This is a story about the loss of someone who was
connected to the author by blood, whom she saw grow up and lived with for many
years, and whom, culturally and societally, she was expected to have a relationship
with; but she had no real relationship with him. She had no great connection
with him, and yet she felt this loss strongly and painfully enough to make a
beautiful work of art as a tribute to him and their lives and relationships
together as she understood them.
I disagree that this book was about loss. Like you said, as the book progresses, it become clear that the narrator never had much of a relationship with her brother. After he’s gone is when she starts to discover who her brother was as a person. I think this book is about indirect discovery. To understand her brother, the narrator goes through memories that she had considered to be insignificant, trying to find something that can give her a clue about the true nature of her brother. We see this through scrapbook like pictures and snit-bits of letters. The narrator also visits her brother’s widow and that provides interesting insights about what her brother was really like.
ReplyDeleteI think this relationship is the most interesting one and the one in which the book sets out to gain a better understanding. The relationship with the mother didn’t seem to have the same kind of depth.